Is This A Better Idea For MPO Connectors?
发布时间 : 2016-10-23 浏览次数 : 284 次As
you can see below (next article) MPO connectors have a large area that
can get dirty. They also depend on the polishing process leaving fibers
protruding from the ferrule surface to ensure physical contact for low
loss and reflectance. A typical MM MPO looks like this on an
interferometer:
Polishing the connector so that all
fibers protrude equally is not easy, but is mandatory to get consistent
loss on all the fibers. You might remember an article in this newsletter
that quoted a study about the MPO claiming
that the outer fibers had higher loss. That article prompted feedback
from a cable manufacturer who said it appeared to be an artifact of the
polishing process and that another brand of polishing machine gave
results where the inner fibers had higher loss. Puzzling!
Another option is the termination process developed by Arrayed Fiberoptics Corp. that
polishes the MPO ferrule so that the fibers are undercut slightly, then
the ferrule is coated with an anti-reflection coating like the coatings
used on photographic lenses. The Arrayed MPO looks like this:
You
can see the fibers do not protrude but are just slightly below the
surface of the ferrule (just microns below). Generally this would cause
high reflectance (~ -20dB) if there were an air gap between the fibers,
but the ferrule ends are coated as you can see in this photo:
The
ferrule on the right has an antireflection (AR) coating that reduces
loss even with non-contact fibers. The manufacturer claims that this
provides more repeatable loss on the line of fibers and reduces
potential damage to the fibers. Although not one of their claims, AR
coatings are often harder than glass and certainly the glass-filled
plastic ferrule, so this should be a much more durable MPO.[1]
[1] The FOA Staff, The FOA. [Online]. Available: visit The FOA. [Accessed: 23-Oct- 2016]